Friday, November 11, 2011

A critique of Lloyd deMause

This post has been reviewed and moved: here

7 comments:

  1. A good refutation of deMause, who is either an active participant in the war against white society or his institution has, like academic life everywhere, been heavily infiltrated. I'm not sure you're amenable to conspiracy theories in spite of your robust defence of European civilization even so. Your understanding of McMartin and SRA is defective, exhibiting a naivete all too common where this subject is concerned in addition, perhaps, to an understandable fear of being made to look silly when you have an academic reputation to protect. Tunnels WERE discovered. The evidence was excluded from the trial by the judge, a fact that went largely unreported on TV and in newspapers. I can't think why.

    http://www.whale.to/b/stickel.html
    http://www.whale.to/b/constantine3.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. True, anon, all he had to do was look up Ralph Underwager and his wife Hollinda Wakefield who came out in support of pedophiles in the Belgian Magazine Padika. Also Pamela and Peter Freyd, who raped their own daughter and Shirley and Paul Eberle, who were involved in the pornographic magazines L.A. star and Finger. The latter contained such insightful gems of erotica as "Sexpot at Five", "My First Rape, She Was Only Thirteen", and "What Happens When Niggers Adopt White Children". These were the sick in the head SOBs who ran the False Memory Foundation.

    But I am sure he is getting the bigger picture, what with the Sandusky and Savile cases, the Rotherham fiasco, the Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton and Dershowitz "Air Fuck One" scandal. It would behoove him to read Dave McGowan's Pedophacracy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. However distasteful you might believe Underwager, Freyd or Eberle to have been, the facts are that none of them were ever convicted of crimes against children. There weren't even any such accusations against Underwager, ever.

      On the other hand, many prominent proponents of secret satanic cult conspiracies and/or corrupted 'elites' "pedophracy" conspiracies, HAVE been convicted of crimes against children; John Todd - convicted of raping a young woman and molesting two children, Tony Alamo - convicted on 10 counts of transporting underage girls across state lines for sex, Paul Bonacci - convicted on three counts of molesting a 9 year old relative, James Bevel - convicted of unlawful fornication involving three of his daughters, Devin Norris - sentenced to 12 years for possession of child pornography, Delmart Vreeland -, convicted on inducement of child prostitution, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation of children, Marcel Vervloesem - convicted on possessing child pornography for his personal use and multiple counts of historic child rape, Michael Shrimpton - convicted on possession of child pornography...and the list goes on & on.

      Not much point to reading McGowan's "Pedophracy", as it contains so many deliberate misquotes, misrepresentations, fantasies and falsehoods that most people couldn't possibly disentangle the facts from the fallacies within it.

      Delete
  3. Ah, more talk of the 'hysteria' surrounding SRA, a hysteria largely created by the press and sustained by the incredulous. The press grows bored and the whole episode is declared an 'urban myth'. Possibly like the heating crisis a few years ago (we were gullible to believe all those elderly people who claimed they couldn't heat their homes - there haven't been any news reports lately so we can only assume they had been pressured into such claims and the whole thing was some mass fantasy). Phew, people can get on with their lives and thank god they aren't gullible fools like all those crazy therapists. Meanwhile dedicated therapists continue to help a steady stream of those escaping groups who use belief systems (as made up and frankly as crazy as any other belief system - chocolate egg to celebrate the resurrection of a dead man anyone?) to terrorize and control their victims. We can believe that people will behead in the name of Allah (because they're Arabs?), dismember African children in the name of some foreign belief such as the boy Adam found in the Thames (because he was black?) but god forbid that we believe that people of our own ethnicity twist a Christian belief system for their own ends.....I would like to remind you that only in the 1980s child abuse was not believed in, let alone organised abuse by paedophile rings. All this has sadly been proven to exist after all. Savile himself was repeatedly described by victims as taking part in bizarre ceremonies during his abuse. He probably didn't believe so does that mean it doesn't count? I think to his terrified victims it makes little difference.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks i like your blog very much , i come back most days to find new posts like this!Good effort.I learnt it

    Moods Condoms Online

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you so much for such a level of thoughtfulness.

    ReplyDelete